Right to Earn an Honest Living – Eyebrow Threading, Kansas Justice InstituteCase Info & Legal Team

Jigisha Modi v. Kansas Board of Cosmetology

This case is about three entrepreneurs and the right to earn an honest living, free from unreasonable government restrictions. In Kansas, it is a crime to remove a single eyebrow with a piece of cotton thread, unless the threader holds a license. It is a crime to hire an unlicensed eyebrow threader.

Jigisha simply wants to hire her mother-in-law, Jyotsna, but can’t. Kansas law requires a government issued permission slip just to be able to use a single piece of cotton thread to groom an eyebrow. The American Dream shouldn’t be crushed by unreasonable rules and regulations like these. What’s happening is unfair and unreasonable, and that’s why Kansas Justice Institute is helping Jigisha, Jignesh, and Jyotsna fight back. – Sam MacRoberts, Litigation Director of Kansas Justice Institute

What is eyebrow threading?

Eyebrow threading is a safe and simple technique that uses a single strand of cotton thread to remove unwanted hair. It does not usually involve skin-to-skin contact and does not reuse the same tools on different customers.

Eyebrow threading is an ancient grooming technique that dates back thousands of years to parts of South Asia and the Middle East. Eyebrow threading uses only a simple cotton thread to form loops as the threader gently removes unwanted facial hair. Threading is gaining popularity and in higher demand among those who have a skin sensitivity to facial waxing due to the swelling and irritation that often occurs with waxing. Since its arrival in the United States, threading has become increasingly popular, offering threaders countless opportunities for employment, entrepreneurship, and their own chance at the American dream.

What’s the problem?

Despite the simplicity and ease of threading, Kansas law requires eyebrow threaders to obtain an esthetician’s license. This license requires a threader to complete at least 1,000 hours of instruction at an expensive esthetician school. Making matters worse, hundreds of hours are spent learning cosmetology methods that threaders do not use or need. It is estimated that .66% of the schooling is devoted exclusively to threading if it is even taught at all. Kansas law also requires aspiring threaders to pass examinations even though threading is barely tested, if it is tested at all. As a result, aspiring threaders are required to endure hundreds of hours of irrelevant training, take irrelevant examinations, and spend thousands of dollars on schooling, examinations, and fees just to be able to use a single piece of cotton thread to groom an eyebrow.

The Kansas Constitution forbids outrageous occupational licensing regimes like this one and protects the right to earn an honest living. Kansans have the right to be free from unreasonable and oppressive laws. – Sam MacRoberts, Litigation Director of Kansas Justice Institute

About the clients

Jigisha Modi is a licensed cosmetologist and operates Miracle Eyebrows, a licensed esthetics business in Olathe, Kansas. She and her husband Jignesh Biscuitwala run the business together.

Jigisha Modi immigrated to the United States in 1997 with the ambition to experience the American dream. She obtained her cosmetology license and started her own business.

Jyotsna Biscuitwala, who is Jignesh’s mother and Jigisha’s mother-in-law, has nearly thirty years of threading experience. She taught her daughter-in-law, Jigisha, the art of threading and desperately wants to work for Jigisha and her son, Jignesh, in their threading salon. However, Jyotsna does not have a license from the Kansas Board of Cosmetology and is unable to obtain one.

Jigisha runs the day-to-day operations of the salon. The salon offers primarily threading services, but because Jigisha is a licensed cosmetologist, she offers other services as well. She makes managerial decisions with her husband, Jignesh, including hiring decisions. It is extremely difficult for Jignesh and Jigisha to find licensed estheticians who are willing and interested in performing eyebrow threading services.

Modi v. Kansas Board of Cosmetology

Date Filed
November 16, 2020
Court
Shawnee County District Court
Case Status
Closed

Case Timeline

NOV
2020
Press Release
NOV
2020
Petition for Declaratory Judgement
JUL
2022
Press Release
JUL
2022
Notice of Dismissal

IN THE NEWS:

Threading Liberation Day in Kansas

Threading Liberation Day in Kansas The state kills a nutty licensing rule after an immigrant sues. The Editorial Board | July 19, 2022 8:58 Talk about a good hair day: On July 1 Kansas liberated salon […]
Read More >

KJI Frees Family from Unreasonable Eyebrow Threading Regulations

Life for a Kansas couple looking to hire another family member to work in the family business became reality as SB 348 became law on July 1, 2022. The bipartisan bill was prompted by a […]
Read More >

Beauty workers fight licensing requirement in court

By Daryl James/Special to Gannett Kansas Indian immigrant Jyotsna Biscuitwala has a job waiting for her at Miracle Eyebrows inside the Walmart Supercenters in Olathe and Shawnee. She is highly qualified and eager to work. […]
Read More >

Cosmetology Board sued over regulations

By Brad Cooper/ Sunflower State Journal A Johnson County cosmetologist and her family are suing the state Cosmetology Board over what they say are excessive regulations for eyebrow threading. Jigisha Modi, her husband and mother in law […]
Read More >

Kansas Wants This Experienced Eyebrow Entrepreneur To Get 1,000 More Hours of Training

By Ella Lubell Jigisha Modi and Jignesh Biscuitwala are a married couple who together run Miracle Eyebrows, an eyebrow threading business with locations in Olathe and Shawnee, Kansas. Struggling to find potential employees, they hoped […]
Read More >

News Release: Entrepreneurs sue as Kansas licensing requirement limits the American Dream

Kansas Justice Institute defends the right to earn an honest living in Kansas OLATHE, KS. – Kansas Justice Institute partnered with three entrepreneurs to fight back against unreasonable occupational licensing requirements. In Kansas, it is […]
Read More >